Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> writes: > The ftp team could ignore that too, but the ftp team could also ignore a > GR, and I think the DPL would be well justified for removing a delegate > either for ignoring an override in a GR or for failing to follow > sensible policies adopted by the TC under 6.1.1.
One tiny quibble: I think section 4.1.3 of the constitution is very clear that no, a project delegate cannot ignore a GR without ignoring the constitution entirely, in which case they could also ignore the DPL changing the delegation and we're in different uncharted territory. I think this is much more explicit than the implications of 6.1.1. (This is just constitutional geekery and I'm sure that it won't come up in this case.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
