On 17258 March 1977, Luca Boccassi wrote:
Whatever end goals some individuals may have is *NOT* a good base to
decide on how a technical implementation for Debian should be.
If it turns out that this new thingie makes Salsa entirely
unneccessary,
then so be it. Good for us.
I highly doubt this will happen. The dgit stuff only implements a
small
subset of features. The BTS does *not* provide what Salsa issues do.
There isn't anything even near to do what MRs do. CI integration?
Even
less so. No idea why anyone should fear this dgit thing will lead to
Salsa getting turned off, at this point.
But really, if we end up getting something that makes an installation
of
gitlab unneccessary, then yay, party. It is not something to be
feared.
So in other words, I am 100% right to worry about this being the thin
end of the wedge that some will use to try and kill Salsa. Sounds like
below NoTA if it goes to GR for anybody who, like me, doesn't want
Salsa to be jeopardised, then.
WTF is up with you? Honest question. I just explained, in a load of
words, that this thing is *really* unlikely to provide whatever it needs
to replace Salsa, as there is basically nothing actually providing the
features Salsa provides. And your conclusion is more "trying to kill
Salsa"?
What?
--
bye, Joerg
