On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 22:08, Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 17258 March 1977, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > And I think it is very much relevant, given the obvious end goal of > > some individuals is to kill Salsa, which this proposal - as it stands > > - would facilitate. > > Whatever end goals some individuals may have is *NOT* a good base to > decide on how a technical implementation for Debian should be. > > If it turns out that this new thingie makes Salsa entirely unneccessary, > then so be it. Good for us. > > I highly doubt this will happen. The dgit stuff only implements a small > subset of features. The BTS does *not* provide what Salsa issues do. > There isn't anything even near to do what MRs do. CI integration? Even > less so. No idea why anyone should fear this dgit thing will lead to > Salsa getting turned off, at this point. > > But really, if we end up getting something that makes an installation of > gitlab unneccessary, then yay, party. It is not something to be feared.
So in other words, I am 100% right to worry about this being the thin end of the wedge that some will use to try and kill Salsa. Sounds like below NoTA if it goes to GR for anybody who, like me, doesn't want Salsa to be jeopardised, then.
