On 3/22/24 21:29, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2024 3:08:53 AM MST Rhonda D'Vine wrote:Unfortunately you still are hung up on your discriminatory and downright disrespectful position that you brought up in 2019 already, haven't learned from the discussion, and still seem to find a way that the Code of Conduct wouldn't apply to you, nor the DFSG#5.I feel very strongly that these types of discussions do not belong in Debian. There are many good causes in the world and much disagreement about what they are. For Debian to succeed, it needs to focus on producing a quality software distribution. Discussions about tangentially related controversial topics, no matter how good the cause may be, doesn’t result in any benefit to those causes but does result in harm to Debian. The animosity in the previous email is representative of this (I have only quoted one of the paragraphs above because I do not find the tone of the message appropriate for a Debian mailing list).
I discussed about my thoughts on general causes in a previous mail.But there are some topics like gender issues that are relevant to Debian. Debian is not just an operating system. It is also a community, one which declares its positive stand regarding diversity. If one does not want to participate in such discussions, they are free to not involve. But when participating, everyone should ensure that the communication is respectful to all and there is no CoC violation.
OpenPGP_0xC7EA1BE1574DED5D.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
