Hey guys, Apologies for not responding more promptly on this sub-thread :-/
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:51:24PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 08:00:48PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: ... >> [1] I understand that your (the Secretary's) current position is that you do >> not have the power to interpret Foundation Documents. I contend that you >> implicitly do, at least insofar as such an interpretation is required to >> fulfill one of your explicit duties. If you do not, then it seems the >> Project Leader would, through a combination of 5.1.3 (requires urgent >> action) and/or 5.1.4 (noone else has responsibility). > >As part of this GR, I'm just trying to make sure you can interpret the >SC in a consistent way that matches the ballot option. > >Thank you for discussion this, I wish more people would participate in >this. Would you be more comfortable if we added an extra option like Russ suggested [1], explicitly adding extra text to the SC? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2022/08/msg00182.html -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
