Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> writes: > I view the official Debian install image as a component of Debian, and > consequently if the (only) official Debian install image were to contain > non-free bits then we would violate DSC#1.
I also find this problematic. As far as I can tell, the alternatives on this vote that results in Debian shipping non-free software will make the project violate the current DSC. Reading https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.en.html I don't understand who decides the majority requirements for voting options, can someone explain? Is it the project secretary? What are they for the current vote? I believe it would be bad for the project if the supermajority requirements of changing a fundational document is worked around by approving a GR vote with simple majority that says things contrary to what the DSC says. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
