On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:06:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [...] it lacks a detail I find crucial: > Explicitly spelling out whether or not images containing non-free bits > are official part of Debian or not. Personally I find it obvious that > anything that would not be allowed into main also would not be treated > as official part of Debian,
I share the same concern as you: Steve's proposal would mean that installers containing non-free firmware become official part of Debian. My text does not. > If Bart chose to extend the proposal to include that such media > containing non-free bits (although permitted "alongside with the free > media) would *not* be considered official part of Debian, then I would > endorse the amended proposal. That would be repeating what's already true. My text includes only things that I propose to change. So what is off/unofficially today, remains that. It's like "the name of the project remains Debian". Why would I mention that. Does this cover your concern? > > > - Jonas > > -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private --
