On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > It's understandable that there is no motivation to choose between two very > > long and complicated (and similar but maybe not?) changes. > > > > True, also (like in my case) I forced myself to find the time to read trough > it and understand it somewhere in the middle of the night to be able to vote > at all. Yes, I think voting is important! > > So in general if there are such big and non-obvious changes to documents, I > think the best option would be to have (require?) a side by side diff as PDF > or in some other readable format available. In this case the old document and > the two propose changes could have been displayed side by side on a few > landscape pages. A diff was provided, at least for the first option, but the changes were still too big to comprehend easily.
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
