On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:51:29PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > It seems highly likely that the message to which I'm replying was not > sent or authorized by Enrico, and that its sender is trying to mislead > Debian members by impersonating a prominent and respected developer.
I can confirm it was not an impersonation attempt. My previous subkeys are due to expire on 2021-06-03 and I've recently generated new ones. They should be properly signed by my master key and I have uploaded them to keyserver.ubuntu.com and keyring.debian.org Using GPG became more complicated recently with the keyserver network collapsing, and on a different venue I'd welcome a serious reassessment of our technical practices of certifying trust :( My proposal was a honest attempt at encoding in a straightforward proposal the gist that I was perceiving from what seemed to me like the majority of posts on -vote. I was honestly interested to see if that represented the feelings of our community at large. If those are indeed the feelings of the majority of a community I'm part of, it is extremely important for me to know. Even so, my proposal, although serious, was motivated mainly by frustration, disappointment, and disgust. Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
