Le 04/12/2019 à 22:43, gregor herrmann a écrit : > On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:11:49 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> gregor herrmann writes ("Re: Reframing"): >>> So yes, for me a combination of options G and D would be (or maybe >>> more accurately: would have been ) helpful in finalizing my ranking >>> of the options given my ambivalence. >> >> To make it concrete I am going to post texts of those two options. If >> people come forward to say they support or or both of them I will >> formally propose them tomorrow morning (in the hope that the Secretary >> and/or the DPL will allow them on the ballot). If you support either >> of these options enough, then please formally propose it yourself and >> I will second it tomorrow. > > Thank you for your work on this! > > I think I would support the G+D combination but given Kurt's mails > from this evening [0] it looks like this ship has sailed, and I will > now follow your example and spend the time before going to bed with > something more enjoyable than reading -vote and thinking the options > through. > > > Cheers, > gregor
Seconded
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature