On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:43:53PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:11:49 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> > gregor herrmann writes ("Re: Reframing"):
> > > So yes, for me a combination of options G and D would be (or maybe
> > > more accurately: would have been ) helpful in finalizing my ranking
> > > of the options given my ambivalence.
> >
> > To make it concrete I am going to post texts of those two options. If
> > people come forward to say they support or or both of them I will
> > formally propose them tomorrow morning (in the hope that the Secretary
> > and/or the DPL will allow them on the ballot). If you support either
> > of these options enough, then please formally propose it yourself and
> > I will second it tomorrow.
>
> Thank you for your work on this!
>
> I think I would support the G+D combination but given Kurt's mails
> from this evening [0] it looks like this ship has sailed, and I will
> now follow your example and spend the time before going to bed with
> something more enjoyable than reading -vote and thinking the options
> through.
If there is a consensus that new options can still be added, I
will consider adding them. As long as I don't sent out the call
for votes, things can be changed. But it currently seems unlikely to
me, so I'm proceeding in the normal process.
Kurt
