On 04/06/2017 06:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Even more, from my experience, the availability of an HCL (ie: Hardware >> Compatibility List) is mandatory for some vendors to choose Debian. At >> $work, I've been told that Debian wouldn't an option for it. > > Would this count as a HCL for your $work? > > https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn
No, because it's just a wiki entry, and there's no way to check how it has been written. A well established process needs to be written (comparable to the Red Hat one that Ritesh wrote later in this thread). >> Note that I am convince the FSF initiative (I can't remember the ugly >> website name, sorry...) is *not* a correct response to this need. We >> need our own thing. > > I guess you mean one of these two: > > https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/respects-your-freedom > https://h-node.org/ Yes, I was referring to h-node. I've been told multiple times that h-node was the HCL for Debian. First, the site is really ugly, and doesn't look serious. Then when you click on hardware, there's a list of "stuff" (scanners, webcams, etc.) but ... no servers! This really looks like laptop oriented to me. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
