On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:54:23 +0100, MJ Ray <m...@phonecoop.coop> said:
[...] > I feel an attempt should be made to reform that process to something > we might stand a chance of implementing, rather than abolish it > entirely, but I'm currently unable to second Don's excellent > amendments. I beg other DDs to consider them favourably. Given that, IIRC, one of the main reasons for wanting to declassify -private was that people wanted to be able to refer to previous discussions on -private that were historically significant, I'm wondering if a more sane approach would be to just say something along the lines of "anything on -private older than 3 years (and excluding the items excluded in the original GR) may be quoted publicly". Doing something like this means for content that people care about, the declassification work gets done by the people who care about it, and nobody has to worry about content that nobody cares about. Alternatively, the "declassification team" could just be a team that receives declassification requests, determines whether the requested posts may be declassified, and if so, plops the posts into a public archive somewhere. This would give more control over the declassification process and make sure that it is done by people who understand the rules. </bikeshed> -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/113A1368 https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368
