On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:45:10AM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote: > What if the DPL begins to consider persistent disagreement with the > DPL as a form of "flaming"?
We can then override the DPL's decision, or recall the DPL. Also, there is a second option on the ballot. You don't have to agree with me... > ----- "Wouter Verhelst" <wou...@debian.org> wrote: > > > I'd like to propose a rationale for option one on the ballot, if I > > may: > > > > Rationale: > > Allowing the DPL to update the Code of Conduct will make it easier > > to > > adapt it to changing circumstances, without having to go through a > > lengthy GR procedure. One of the roles of the DPL is to mediate in > > case of conflict; therefore, the DPL is in an ideal position to > > detect > > when an update to the code of conduct may be necessary. > > > > If the DPL were to go rogue and replace the Code of Conduct by a > > blank > > page (or similar), we already have sufficient procedures to recall > > or > > override the DPL. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/16041386.67041395560710985.javamail.r...@newmail.brainfood.com > > -- This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space. If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to space today. -- http://xkcd.com/1133/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140323075445.gd26...@grep.be
