What if the DPL begins to consider persistent disagreement with the DPL as a form of "flaming"?
----- "Wouter Verhelst" <wou...@debian.org> wrote: > I'd like to propose a rationale for option one on the ballot, if I > may: > > Rationale: > Allowing the DPL to update the Code of Conduct will make it easier > to > adapt it to changing circumstances, without having to go through a > lengthy GR procedure. One of the roles of the DPL is to mediate in > case of conflict; therefore, the DPL is in an ideal position to > detect > when an update to the code of conduct may be necessary. > > If the DPL were to go rogue and replace the Code of Conduct by a > blank > page (or similar), we already have sufficient procedures to recall > or > override the DPL. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/16041386.67041395560710985.javamail.r...@newmail.brainfood.com
