On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:54:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:34:31PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > Formally accepted :) > > So I inserted that after 2, and it now reads: > <ol> > <li>The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for > participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of > communication within the project. > > <li>The initial text of this code of conduct replaces the "mailinglist > code of conduct" at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct > > <li>Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR > procedure. However, the DPL (or the DPL's delegates) can add or > remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section > after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR. > > <li>The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format. > </ol> > > Can you confirm that that was your intention?
Not what I meant, but I'll grant you there's some room for confusion here. I have accepted Neil's original proposal to drop the second item in the above, and make it an extra entry in the "further reading" section. Under A.1.2, that means my original proposal and Neil's amendment A should now be considered one and the same thing, both using Neil's text (unless any of the seconders of my original proposal were to object, which so far nobody has done and which would surprise me, given the seconders of the original proposal and of Neil's first amendment are largely the same people) I interpret all that as meaning Neil's second amendment must now be based upon his first amendment (which, indeed, his proposal as sent was not). It would therefore read: <ol> <li>The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of communication within the project. <li>Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR procedure. However, the DPL (or the DPL's delegates) can add or remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR. <li>The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format. </ol> i.e., dropping item 2 (and adding the text of his amendment A to the "further reading" section). A strict reading of Neil's original text would indeed imply the above is wrong, but I would be surprised if that were his intention, given that he proposed that change in the first place... -- This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space. If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to space today. -- http://xkcd.com/1133/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
