On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 11:28:00AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > Hi Wouter, > > On 8 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Wouter Verhelst <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:05:45PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > >> > >> Amendment A - move mailing list CoC text to "further reading" > > After some consideration, I accept this amendment. > > Thank you very much :) > > >> Amendment B - Updates to the CoC should be via developers as a whole > > So rather than accepting this amendment, I propose that we modify > > paragraph 3 read as follows, instead: > > > > ------- > > 3. Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR > > procedure. However, the DPL or the DPL's delegates can add or > > remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section > > after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR. > > ------- > > > > The idea here is that a DPL can add a link to something considered > > useful, while "normal" DD's can still add such a link through a GR if > > the DPL is opposed. > > > > How's that sound? > > > That sounds very sensible to me, I'd be happy to accept it. I'm not sure what > formal process Kurt would like me to follow to get these incorporated - Kurt?
I think it should follow the normal rules of accepting amendements and that if a sponsor doesn't agree he should speak up. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
