Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> writes: > ]] Russ Allbery > > > Second, Matthew's proposal explicitly doesn't change the TC decision, so > > I'm not even sure what you think would be aborted here. It wouldn't have > > any effect on the choice of default. It dictates in a top-down manner to > > individual developers how to do their work and undermines the flexibility > > of Debian contributors in ways that I think are unnecessary and a little > > condescending, and requires work be done without identifying anyone who is > > going to do the work, which is why I voted against it. But it's not some > > sort of end-run around the previous decision. > > The previous decision does say that it is replaced completely by the > text of such a position statement and I do note that the proposed GR > does, very carefully, not refer to systemd as the default. It makes for > a clumsier construction, which when combined with the level of legal-ish > arguments being made here, makes me suspicious.
Please don't read anything into the lack of mentioning systemd in my GR proposal. I in no way intend to undermine their decision that systemd is the default linux init for jessie. I thought "The TC's decision on the default init system for Linux in jessie stands undisturbed." was clear enough. Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5ba9d82vwp....@chiark.greenend.org.uk
