On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:16:57AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > The part I don't understand is why reference is made to any TC decision > at all. Unless the objectives include overturning the decision on the > default Linux init system for jessie, I see no reason to invoke the GR > clause in that resolution at all. > > Why isn't this just a standalone GR asserting a "position statement > about issues of the day" on the coupling question?
Ian's backdoor would then trigger and abort the TC decision, so he says. > Bdale Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
