On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 13:41, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:34, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Jacob Hallén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Debian is not 100% free software, and it never has been. >> > >> > Indeed. Those instances where it's not free are bugs to be fixed. >> >> So, you actually wanna do something to fix those bugs or wanna simply >> talk about them? > > That's a false dichotomy. The talk in this context is regarding > whether they are DFSG violations at all.
Really? so can you please show us what you've done to fix them? >> I see too many emails sent and too few RC bugs fixed. If you (like >> others) would really work for Debian instead of only filling >> lists.d.o archives, Debian would be a better distribution, but maybe >> it's not in your interest. > > Whereas I don't think it's acceptable to allow false statements or > poor argument to go unchallenged, especially when discussing a vote on > a resolution that impacts the foundation documents of the project. You're discussing docs for a project you're NOT part of, and you're proposing resolutions/suggestions you can NOT even vote for or against; I can't see the point. > Note that we can both have what we are asking for: discussing a > general resolution does not preclude working to improve Debian. Sure we can, then why don't do both instead of just writing emails? -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
