"Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:34, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jacob Hallén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Debian is not 100% free software, and it never has been. > > > > Indeed. Those instances where it's not free are bugs to be fixed. > > So, you actually wanna do something to fix those bugs or wanna simply > talk about them?
That's a false dichotomy. The talk in this context is regarding whether they are DFSG violations at all. > I see too many emails sent and too few RC bugs fixed. If you (like > others) would really work for Debian instead of only filling > lists.d.o archives, Debian would be a better distribution, but maybe > it's not in your interest. Whereas I don't think it's acceptable to allow false statements or poor argument to go unchallenged, especially when discussing a vote on a resolution that impacts the foundation documents of the project. Note that we can both have what we are asking for: discussing a general resolution does not preclude working to improve Debian. -- \ “What you have become is the price you paid to get what you | `\ used to want.” —Mignon McLaughlin | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
