On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:36:06PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > we'll be more likely to be push many of them towards installing > other (even less free) systems instead.
Is there a reason why those interested in supporting blob-dependant hardware can't make a release that includes those blobs? As per SC #1 they can't refer to it as "Debian", but they can use the project's resources to build and distribute it, and there can be healthy interaction between both codebases. What I mean to say, is that there's no need for end users to jump from one edge to the other. A middle ground can be useful too. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
