On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:54:13PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:50:40PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > The bug being more than 60 days old, does it mean that we have to move > > glibc to non-free (and with it, half of the archive to contrib)? It > > would be faster to move everything to non-free. > > Neither the SC nor my proposed text enforce moving stuff to contrib,
It does, packages in main cannot (Build-)?Depend upon non-free, hence must be moved to contrib. If you move linux to non-free (ignoring the blatant silliness of such an action), every package that needs linux-source would move to contrib. Say kernel-package, m-a, all the kernel-patches, iptables, ... everything. And ... even the glibc since it uses linux-libc-dev to build, so in turn 90% of Debian shall go to contrib. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpYnfRWIdJPG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
