On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:13:05AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > While we're at it, I've long felt that a one-year DPL term is just too > > short (because a DPL needs to spend a few months to get worked in, and > > can't do all that much when the next election is about to turn up for > > fear of being accused to be campaigning, often leaving only slightly > > over half a year or so of time for real work to be done). If more people > > feel like it, I'll draft up an amendment that turns it into a two-year > > term, or so.
> Please formulate a GR and I'll second it immediately. 18-24 months seems > sensible, annual elections are a waste of everyone's time. I know, we should set the DPL term to be equal to the release cycle; that way the DPL will be suitably encouraged to make sure the release never stalls out ;) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
