On ti, 2007-07-31 at 23:04 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Speaking as someone who once almost was a candidate, I would like to > > point out that a two-year commitment is rather more difficult to make > > for many people than a one-year commitment. That is not a reason to > > avoid doing it, but it should be considered. > > Note that you're still free to step down after one year, so that's > hardly a problem (of course it's better if you announce your intention > to serve only for one year during the campaign...).
"I know the job is for two years, but I only want to do half the job, so please vote for me, I'm better than those others who are willing to do the whole job." I would not vote for such a candidate; I would not be such a candidate. Your mileage may vary, of course: I am not suggesting my sense of doing the right thing is the right one for everyone. -- You need fewer comments, if you choose your names carefully. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
