* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070729 10:18]: > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > ftbfs.de is dealing with volatile, experimental buildd's, non official > > > architectures. Thing that I'd have personally liked to see dealt with > > > by debian.org and DSA. Sadly, DSA is AWOL/unresponsive/whatever. Unlike > > > > FWIW, DSA has about nothing to do with buildds. > > Except setting them up, applying security updates, etc. Of course it > happens that the buildd managers and the DSA have common members so the > policy is not 100% clear.
You might notice that not all buildds that use the wanna-build on buildd.d.o are DSA maintained. And not in all cases are DSA members the buildd maintainers, even in cases where the machine is in ud-ldap. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
