On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:24:11PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > - step 2: waiting for an AM. > > > Step 2: is not long nowadays, maybe 1 month. Well, if people can't > > wait a month, then they should not help Debian-we-release-every-10-years > > in the first place ;) > > I disagree. I was advocated on 7 Mar 2007. I then waited 79 days during which > time the queue in front of me for being assigned an AM went from 12 to 15 to > 11. At this point I convinced tbm to take me, even though he was trying to > reduce his AM load (and for which I'm grateful). If I hadn't I would not be > suprised if I were still waiting for an AM. The current queue waiting for an > AM > contains Marco Amadori (advocated 1st March), Anthony Wong (11th march), Nigel > Croxton (21st March) and Magnus Holmgren (27th March). All of these people > have been waiting for over 4 months. I see no reason that the rest of the > queue > would not also wait at least this long.
That's odd, because the AM leader board shows there is at least a small dozen of slots free... But as a matter of a fact, this part could become a real bottleneck again (yes I see again, when I passed NM, having an AM needed 6+ monthes). This 4 month delay sucks, but it's a new phenomenon afaict. By new I mean, it's a relapse. Maybe FD can confirm, but it also seems that there is less AMs that there was before. I mean less slots available. As I did reduced mine, I can tell it's half because I don't have time, and half because being an AM suck (especially for the reasons I already cited). -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpkibfkMQTve.pgp
Description: PGP signature
