Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > - Sense of participation > There is no community without a group of individuals participating and > a better community is one where these individuals feel that they're > part of the group. > > - Hard work > There is no doubt that hard work can be done to intentionally make a > community worse, but hard work usually makes a community better. > > - Good results > Good results are interesting for the atmosphere, to bring more people > in the community and stuff like that. > > - Hear Feedback > That's good when those who aren't direct involved in the community > feel that they're part, share this sense of participation with them > listening their feedback makes a better community. > > The dunc-tank initiative give us the opportunity to exercise the four > things i outlined above. [...]
Perhaps opportunity, but did it happen? - Sense of participation - many DDs chose to reduce their participation because they felt unvalued, some publicly, some quietly; - Hard work - the reduced participation made more work hard work IMO; - Good results - did we release? Were any proper measurements taken? - Hear feedback - and then ignore lots of it and take the process effectively 'out of reach' of the project. So, how are we better than we were before dunc-tank? Puzzled, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
