On 10818 March 1977, Martin Wuertele wrote: Seconded. The whole quote below. Ie the full proposal.
> I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and > therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian > constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping > the Package Policy Committee as defined[2] in place until the Debian > Project Leader has found at least three people "who'll be active in > maintaining policy according to the policy process"[3] and delegates > them. Consequently the REJECT for uploads of debian-policy must be > removed. > > My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the > delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the > policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian > Project Leader. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00233.html > [2]http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00238.html -- bye Joerg > 20. What would you do if you wanted to retire from the project? Remove the passphrase from the (secret) gpg key and post it to debian-devel. The keyring maintainers will lock the account ASAP.
pgp41eF2BKAjN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
