On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote: > My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the > delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the > policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian > Project Leader.
I don't get it. You want to override a decision not because the decision is bad on its face, but because of a *guess* as to the reason for it? That makes no sense. What difference does the reason make? If it's a good decision, then let it stand. If it's a bad decision, then let it not. Do you believe it's a bad decision, and if so, why? -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]