On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:13:11 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> 6. We further note that some of the firmware does not have a proper
> license, and as thus falls implicitly under the generic Linux kernel
> GPL license. ...
I have a bit of trouble parsing that last bit. The "GPL" doesn't seem
to make sense to me grammatically. (And "GPL license" is redundant.)
Maybe something like "... under the GNU GPL, the generic license of the
Linux kernel." Or "... under the GNU GPL, the generic Linux kernel
license." if you prefer.
> 7. We will work with those firmware vendors post-etch, to resolve
> any remaining incompatibilities, including (but not limited to)
> clarification of the license, provision of the preferred form or
^^
of
> modification, or any other action that will allow the ekrnel to
^^^^^^
kernel
> comply rigorously with the DFSG.
--
Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
