Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:45:14AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I am asking Frederik to accept this >> > amendment, failing which, I am also seeking formal seconds for this. >> >> I would prefer that Frederik accept it, but in case he doesn't, I second >> this proposal: > > There is little doubt that Fredrik will not accept it, since it says all the > contrary to what the intention was, and makes for a useless GR.
As I understand it, the proposal said "distributed under a DFSG free license" and meant that it has such a license statement, not that we are actually able to fulfill all requirements (like providing source). If this is ambiguous, maybe it should be worded better. I also assumed that my perception is correct that most of the drivers actually have such a license statement. However, I have read in your other post that you believe most of them are erroneously under GPL. All that is very confusing. Maybe I should revoke my seconding, and instead wait whether the meeting on the weekend will bring us a "consensus" proposal. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
