On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:28:15 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Previously, the proposal has been named on the ballot, such as: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/03/msg00003.html Very short proposal, so full text was on the ballot as well. Also, more than a up/down vote. > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/06/msg00004.html The full text does not seem to be present on this one -- but there were multiple options, so needed names to disambiguate. > and even when there's only one option: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/06/msg00004.html > Also, if there is no material from the proposal in the ballot, how > do the wordings "consequently" decide the form of it? (constitution > A.2.3) >>>>> However, the final decision on the form of ballot(s) is the >>>>> Secretary's Apparently, the proposer and the secretary both felt that the form on the ballot was OK -- or do you have a better idea what the proposer of the GR wanted? > Finally, if comments are unwelcome, why bother posting a draft > ballot with a message that suggests it's OK to comment? I never said comments were not welcome. I also never said I'd blindly agree to whatever people commented. manoj -- "You know, we've won awards for this crap." David Letterman Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
