Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the > > constitution" is not descriptive enough. > > Since there is only one issue where voting is open, anyone who > can't figure out what is being voted upon probably should not be > voting. Especially since there was a link to the vote page.
Previously, the proposal has been named on the ballot, such as: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/03/msg00003.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/06/msg00004.html and even when there's only one option: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/06/msg00004.html Also, if there is no material from the proposal in the ballot, how do the wordings "consequently" decide the form of it? (constitution A.2.3) Finally, if comments are unwelcome, why bother posting a draft ballot with a message that suggests it's OK to comment? Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
