On Sep 06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > No, it's a contentious issue because some people are trying hard to > >> > change the values of Debian replacing what was a compromise widely > >> > accepted by everybody in Debian and most people outside Debian with > >> > mindlessly following their idea of the DFSG. > >> I'm sorry, when did Debian accept that compromise? > > When the DFSG was created. > Oh, come on. The DFSG says that firmware counts as free? Where? The widely accepted custom was to interpret the DFSG this way, yes. This is what matters.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
