Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am entirely happy for the d-i team to never do the work. But that > does not mean that the kernel team should therefore be allowed to go > ahead and ship non-free programs in their packages.
That's something different than what you said in your original message, which was about using a stick to get developers to do work. I don't agree with that way of looking at it. The above is less objectionable and comes down to a question of whether we, as a project, want to try to solve this problem for etch, postpone it, or not solve it at all, with the understanding that postponing it has so far not resulted in a solution later. I think you've made it clear what side you're on. But please, let's not talk about trying to force developers to work on particular projects. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
