On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:48 -0500, Raul Miller wrote: foundation documents. > > > > This makes no sense because the text of the modifications is not given. > > I disagree. > > Here are some definitions for "modifications": > http://www.answers.com/modifications > And here's some definitions for the associated word "modify": > http://www.answers.com/modify > > In particular, note definition 1 for modify: > > To change in form or character; alter. > > Put more bluntly: the constitution does not require that the text > be editted for 3:1 supermajority requirement cases.
Well, I am actually inhabiting the real world rather than the Debian parallel universe! An amendment to a document (in the real world) always implies a change of text; that is how you can tell that it has changed. -- Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA ======================================== Do you want to know God? http://www.lfix.co.uk/knowing_god.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
