On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > > The text of my proposal clearly states that it is not a proposal to > > modify the DFSG. It is not even a proposal to interpret the existing > > DFSG. It makes some of the existing interpretations of DFSG invalid > > but it doesn't suggest which interpretation is the right. > > Then it _is_ a proposal to modify the DFSG: by excluding some > interpretations, it makes the DFSG more specific.
Any proposal that states "GFDL is non-free" also makes DFSG more specific but I doubt our secretary is going to require 3:1 majority for the proposal favoured by him. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
