On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:16:40AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If your interpretation does not require any list of exceptions than > > your interpretation makes GPL and many other licenses non-free. You > > are free to have such interpretation but you have no right to call it > > obvious reading of DFSG. > > The GPL does not place any restrictions on which sections of the > program may be changed.
Yes. I am not arguing that the invariant sections are better than the restriction in GPL. What I am arguing is that "the license must allow arbitrary modifications without list of exceptions" makes GPL to be non-free license. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
