Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:17:54PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > No, I think that Anton Zinoviev's amendment to the GR does *not* >> > require a change to the DFSG. >> >> For this to be true, it must seem like a plausible interpretation of >> the words of the DFSG. Can you work me through this then, since I >> (and others) are so lunk-headed that we have not seen it? > > Everybody has the right to have his own opinion. I do not insist that > you have to acknowledge my interpretation as plausible. The point is > that > > 1. There is absolutely no decision in the Debian project that would > make my interpretation invalid. > > 2. My interpretation is supported by some Debian developers (and > probably by many Debian developers).
Excuse me, what exactly is your interpretation? And I don't mean "The GFDL is free", but a general statement which modifications DFSG 3 requires to be allowed. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
