Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are not allowed to distribute a patch against work A which turs it > into a patch against work B. You are not allowed to do this because > this patch would be based both on works A and B. This makes it to be > "work based on B" so you have to distribute it in the form > original_B+patch. We have here a circular deadlock.
"Patch" doesn't have to mean unified diff format. It's practical to produce a file that describes a mechanical transformation of work B plus an insertion of lines from work A. That's not realistically a derived work of B. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
