Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> All they need to do, if you are right, is proceed to declare that >> their change is really just an interpretation of whatever is already >> there. And, by hypothesis, they can present a claim that heck, a > > Actually, a group of developers, no matter how large, can proceed to > claim whatever they want, but the project's interpretation is up to > the secretary. If (s)he is in the minority of one, it is still _his_ > interpretation that matters, nobody elses.
This would be my view too. But we have people claiming that the secretary is somehow remiss in deciding such a case himself, on the sole grounds that there are a bunch of people who say they think differently. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
