On Wednesday 01 February 2006 18:17, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Nobody has, at all, even in the least even *presented* this supposed > interpretation of the DFSG under which the GFDL passes.
Okay, I just presented on in my last e-mail, so you can stop saying this. -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
pgpGPvpjJVByr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
