Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not a question of opposing the previous choice but it's fair to > leave a chance to those who have not voted the first time (me included) > to express their disagreeement.
Hrm, I wonder, where was the part the first time that you didn't have that chance? > I have to say that when one needs to vote on a "change of a foundation > text", he needs to see a diff of the change and a set of rationale why > those changes were proposed. The absence of those elements directly led > to my decision to not vote... I've let people who had enough time to > have read the thread vote for me... Really? Why didn't you bother to do it yourself? Or vote against it?
