> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:37:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:49:39PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:42:06AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > And this brings up a good point. Andrew, why can you and Raul not be > bothered to collect the current versions of your proposals, and post > here a solicitation for seconds on them, especially in the face of AJ's? I can't answer for Andrew. However, I have done what you suggesteed. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200402/msg00038.html Furthermore, I'm currently in favor of AJ's proposal, and am letting my own proposal languish. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200402/msg00070.html There's also the issue of "how do we update the social contract", but that probably warrants either: [a] its own mailing list and archive/repository, so that a group of interested people can thrash out the major issues, proposals, and alternatives, and/or [b] someone inhumanly dedicated and capable [and thick skinned] to write the perfect proposal from whole cloth. Thanks, -- Raul
