On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:14:05AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > What baffles me is why you 'keep non-free'ers think that encouraging
> > alternatives would *not* be the status quo?
>
> Can we possible avoid phrases like "you 'keep non-free'ers"? If you
> want to be offensive, "you idiots" is much less snide, and if you don't,
> you're not achieving your goals.
Contrary to your belief I have nothing personal against any of you. I
quoted 'drop non-free proponents' from Sven's mail yesterday and
shortened it a bit in this mail.
My apologies if I offended anybody.
Michael
--
"The discussion did NOT turn to a flameware, mostly because
french-speaking people are really polite people, as you probably know
if you have ever driven in the Paris area.. :-)"
-- Christian Perrier
