On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > What baffles me is why you 'keep non-free'ers think that encouraging > alternatives would *not* be the status quo?
Can we possible avoid phrases like "you 'keep non-free'ers"? If you want to be offensive, "you idiots" is much less snide, and if you don't, you're not achieving your goals. Cheers, aj, who doesn't know why you movie-star lookalikes have to be so "us v them" -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
