On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > I would like to express my disagreement toward attempt to reject input > from users and contributors[1] on issues that will impact them, by > resorting to ad hominem attack and sheer contempts in total disregard > of our current Social Contract.
That's a pretty long sentence. I disagree with several parts of it: [1] That "input" was "rejected" by indicating logical flaws and points of uncertainty about what was being said. [2] It's true that deleting part of the social contract will impact users and contributors. However, raising questions when people advocate deleting parts of the contract is still appropriate. [3] What you claim was "ad hominem and sheer contempts" was actually a statement of uncertainty about the basis for pressuring us to delete part of the social contract. -- Raul
