On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > (It is not part of debian, we were told in the past. Opponents of the > > suggested GR seem to forget that and talk of things like removing from > > debian, or phasing out from debian.) What's your suggested plan for > > I don't really care if it is part of debian or not, what we are speaking > about here is the debian infrastructure. If we were to move non-free to > a virtual non-free host or something, pointing to the real debian > infrastructure, this would be fine with me, but seriously, i don't see > what would be gained by it.
I see only one vital point for having those packages on the "real Debian infrastructure", instead of a mere copy of it: You could continue to reassign bugs from non-free to main. Anything else I missed? Michael
