On 2004-01-04 14:46:03 +0000 Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But our "non-free" includes non-software (such as fonts) and what he > > calls > > "semi-free" software, so you're using ambiguous terminology here.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:34:54AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > There is no reason for the FDL-related debate "what is software?" to > appear in this thread. Please do not continue with it. But that documentation was still there in sarge's non-free when I looked, yesterday. And, looking at the first sixth of the Packages list sid's non-free, just a moment ago, I see half a dozen such package. Which brings me to: what's your point? -- Raul
